Piccolo Teatro

By

Mangaung And A Lesson In Political Brinkmanship

By Nco Dube
Jacob Zuma’s biggest strength is simply that most of us underestimate him. We look so much at his blunders and gaffes that we forget that he has in fact been a leader in the ANC for decades and has vast experience in that regard. We also seem to forget that behind that constant chuckle lies a veteran spy chief, mean negotiator and a master in political brinksmanship.

It seems Julius Malema and his bevy of advisors and political backers have underestimated the ANC President at every turn of their bruising power struggle. Malema’s biggest miscalculation was thinking Zuma. Act, he did, emphatically.

We were all blind sighted by the seemingly meaningless show of unity the ANC’s Top Six leadership and didn’t see this bolt of lightning coming. I bet even Malema and his backers within the Top Six didn’t see it either, if they did, they must have seen it too late. Malema’s stunned silence after the suspension announcement is testimony to this.
Malema has shown himself to be a political novice who accumulated too much political clout too early. Before he learnt how it is dispensed, before he learnt the art of brinksmanship, as Dr Somadoda Fikeni put it. He just has no idea how far to push the envelope before backing down.
It somehow got to his head that he removed Thabo Mbeki from power. In his twisted mind he believes he put Jacob Zuma in power. This is so far from the truth it doesn’t even know how to spell the word ‘truth’.
Thabo Mbeki dug his own grave and even started burying himself in it after he had dug it. Also, it was Thabo Mbeki that unwittingly set the stage for Jacob Zuma’s rise to power. It is as simple as that. Malema, with all his insults played a miniscule role in that process.
There is an argument, by mostly Mbeki disciples that Malema was allowed to insult Mbeki and is being dealt with now because he insulted Zuma, and how this points to inconsistencies in how the ANC dispenses discipline. They are right, of course. But what they do not answer is how then Malema should be dealt with. Should he be left to continue with his barbaric politics and run the ANC (and the country with it) down?
It seems that the proponents of this argument miss the irony. That they are now defending the same Malema because it suits them just like Zuma turned a blind eye when it suited him.
He clearly wasn’t disciplined then because his madness suited those in power. If he were politically astute he would then know that he can’t use the same tactics against the very same people. It bares his lack of political maturity and even common sense.
There is also an argument that Malema is being persecuted, not for ill discipline, but rather for the ANCYL’s policy proposals on nationalization and economic transformation. This is pure fiction designed to mobilise YL members behind him. The Malema DC is purely about power within the ANC and its upcoming conference. The ANCYL’s preferred candidate for ANC President Kgalema Motlanthe has not demonstrated any views on nationalization that are different from the official ANC position. He has in fact emphasized that position in the media and in Parliament.
What will be interesting is how the ANCYL will respond to this suspension given their undertaking that Malema will remain their President even if he is expelled by the ANC and their ‘absurd’ assertion that the ANC NDC sanctions on YL members are subject to a review by the YL.
The few YL provinces that have reacted to the suspension have been hardly surprising but not as sharp and attacking as has been the norm.
The responses seem to forget the number of YL structures that the Malema leadership has summarily disbanded and members that were summarily suspended pending charges, some of whom are still waiting for those charges months later, in contravention of the ANCYL constitution.
Evidence, rather than pointing to Zuma as a dictator points to tendencies exhibited by Malema himself towards opposing views within the YL. In contrast to Malema’s assertions of dictatorship, Zuma has been accused of being indecisive and trying to please everybody. Poor leadership style yes, but hardly characteristics of a dictator.
Malema seems to have exhausted his political capital and has become a liability to his masters. He was a dedicated soldier for Fikile Mbalula’s campaign for the ANC’s Secretary Generalship but we haven’t seen the astute Mbalula’s defending his friend as loudly as we would expect.
Julius has become, as he put it, a leper and people are afraid to be identified with him. One would remember Zuma, in the aftermath of the rape charges, being treated the same way. Is Malema in the same situation now? Will he bounce back like his former hero did?
One thing we must know is that when Malema goes he will not go with dignity like Mbeki did. He will not put the ANC or even the YL ahead of himself.

6 responses to “Mangaung And A Lesson In Political Brinkmanship”

  1. Maskandi Avatar
    Maskandi

    Very interesting article Mr Dube. I just have one question however, you say ” Thabo Mbeki dug his own grave and even started burying himself in it after he had dug it”. Would you care to explain to the rest of us how he did this. As I recall there was nothing that Thabo did to “dig his own grave” as you so eloquently put it. It’ll be interesting to know that you can actually back up what you say with some kind of valid proof, if not then you’re just another blabber. I sure hope you’re not.

    1. ncodube Avatar

      Maskandi, thank you for taking the time to read my blabbering. Firstly, I am not an analyst and do not have to back anything up with proof or the like. I simply comment on things as I see them and what appears on this blog is simply my opinion. But to answer your question simply, TM dug his own grave by failing to lead the ANC to a point where there was a successor to him that he ‘approved’ of and one that would be generally be accepted by most in the borader movement. By the time he realised his failure, it was too late and his ‘safe’ deputy had already ingratiated and positioned himself for leadership after TM. In his trying to rectify the situation, he further dug the grave deeper by underestimating his ‘safe Deputy by thinking his usual modus operandi by which he had dispensed of the likes of Ramaphosa, Phosa and others would work with JZ as well. As it turned out, it did not work and JZ is still here. Had TM planned the leadership succession well, he wouldnt have had to endure the humiliating defeat at Polokwane. He would have instead been a kingmaker and ‘anointed’ his own person. Contrary to popular belief, the vote for JZ in Polokwane was more of a vote against TM than a vote for JZ. Had there been an alternative brought forward by TM, that alternative im certain would have been victorious. also, on this blog, we welcome differing opinions and debate but name calling is not welcome. Let’s differ respectfully if we have to differ.

  2. Maskandi Avatar
    Maskandi

    Very interesting take on TM’s downfall, but as u said, its just your opinion. Again, if u go back to what l said, l said u’d be blabbering (IF) u culdnt back up what u’re sayin with some kind of analysis based on da events d@ took place. Now firstly, nobody in da ANC is so poweful as to pick their own successor as we all know that the top positions are decided on a ballot. So theres nothing TM could have done to either place or remove JG from the position of ANC pres. The decision just wasnt his to make whether he approved of it or not

    Now, If u can think back to the interview Gen Sec Gwede Mantashe gave after the new NEC had met for the first time at the national conference in December 2007 in PLK, he said they had decided that TM would remain president of the country until his term ended in April 2009.

    Now, between this time and September 2008, what happened? Why did the NEC suddenly recall TM on the basis that they didnt trust him?

    Very good question. To understand that, you have to think back to the events that took place after that. You’ll remeber that during 2008, corruption charges were re-instated on JZ because the supreme court had agreed UNANIMOUSLY that there was no reason for the charges to be dropped. This left to the JZ legal team going back and forth about whether or not to take the issue to the constitutional court. Remember, there was a high likelihood that the constitutional court would also give the same verdict.

    Before this could happen the NEC decided, that the best way to have the charges dropped on their master was to put a dummy at the position of National DIrector of public prosecutor which at the time was held by Vusi Pikoli. But they couldnt fire Pikoli because only one person has that power, the state president. So, how do we do this? How do we fire Vusi Pikoli? Easy, lets recall Mbeki. We’ll just tell the nation we’ve simply lost trust in him. But lets not replace him with JZ right away. Because if JZ fires Pikoli himself, it would have been too obvious that he’s simply firing him as a means to have the charges against himself dropped. Remember Pikoli is the man who’s prosecuting JZ. Lets make it look proffesional by letting comrade Kgalema do da dirty work. KM comes in for 2 things, 1 fire VP and 2 hire our dummy Mokoteti Mpshe. When Mpshe is the director of public prosecution, he’s there for 1 job, drop the charges on JZ. By the time JZ walks into office, hes smelling like roses, not a single charge on him. Thats whay Mbeki was fired.

    1. ncodube Avatar

      You miss two points, firstly, in theory the ANC is led by a collective but a sitting president wields a certain amount of power within that collective and TM held above average power. Secondly, you seem to distort history at will. Pikoli was fired for the Selebi matter, not the JZ matter. It was indeed convenient for the JZ cause that he left but TM had started the process and had already suspended him and appointed a board of inquiry. This was done because Pikoli had defied TM by charging Selebi, apparently in disregard of ‘state security’. By the time KM became president, Pikoli’s fate was already sealed by TM. Let us not degenerate commentary on this piece into a TM/JZ debate, its overdone and outdated.

  3. Mlungisi Avatar
    Mlungisi

    Interesting analyses Nco and Maskandi interesting analyses too.

  4. Maskandi Avatar
    Maskandi

    Hahahaha! You aint getting off that easy. The point here Mr Dube is this, Mbeki had done nothing wrong to deserve either to be recalled or for people to say he dug his own grave. He did no such thing. His recalling was done as a means to sweep JZ ‘s corruption charges under the carpet by those to whom it was clear that had the matter ended up in court, he stood no chance of being acquitted. Im not doing that to degenerate commentry to a debate between TM vs JZ, rather lm doing it to correct the notion that the recalling of TM was done as a service to society which you obviously also share.

    It will be clear to you if you follow the story. It had nothing to do with TM’s conduct either as state pres or as the then former ANC pres as many including yourself have been deluded into believing.

    If you remember correctly, KM set up a commission which was headed by Ginwala to look into whether or not VP was fit to hold office as Director of public prosecutor. The commision not only found him fit, but they also strongly recommended that he be re-instated into the post. After this finding, KM fired him. So it is baseless for you to say he was fired by TM. Also,the NPA went on to prosecute Jackie Selebi, how could they fire the man who was prosecuting JS supposedly for the very reason that he was prosecuting JS and then go on to prosecute JS? This makes no sense at all.

    TM was trying to protect JS which is why he fired VP. But when KM came into office he fired VP for his own agenda, which was to bring in Mpshe, nothing at all to do with TM’s cause. Which is why JS ended up in court. You cant talk about these events as if the cause behind them was the same.

Leave a comment